|
Spicy Shots - Forthright, Spicy, analytical notes on some subjects / outfits - Why Not ? |
|
I have the fundamental democratic right to pen my bold and sincere views: Click for Links: .Hit List / site map 3 |
|
Indict lever Judicial Mockery Sell Rashtrapathi Bhavan Government cheats on gas Fuel Subsidy Fake Leasing Iron Mines |
| Main section The Hair Saver Site map 1 Haircare...Tips for the Top.. RUfooled. |
| Fuel Subsidy Fake |
Last Point / manipulated cacophony, first
10. Pathetic or self serving persons ?
You would also be annoyed like me with the Press and the umpteen Experts who spoiled my mood, by blabbering nonsense on TV and Print Media, justifying the need for raise / link to Crude prices
a] Mr. Sharma of ONGC does not have to toe the Government line. But he does. Is he angling for second term ? He is satisfied that ONGC gets 57 Dollars per barrel Should he not reduce the price of petrol and diesel, with the excess profits ONGC is earning ?
b] I cannot understand why persons like Kirit Parikh or Rangarajan accept predecided assignments / vague briefs and come with reports, which only lower their standards
If they have ignored Petrol content in Crude, they have ignored a basic point
If I transfer my money from the right side pant packet to the left side, and leave only some loose changes and ask an expert, judge or anyone to verify only my right hand side packet, they can detail my money in the right side packet and certify that it is very small. They have failed to inspect all the relevant packets.
Such an assessment is worthless, even if it is authored by persons like Rangarajan, written in Queen's English and presented with nice design and lay out.
Parikh's report is a meaningless exercise in futility.
Around 5th June 2010, Mr. Parikh blabbered on CNBC TV 18 that increase in petrol prices would mean less Pollution and better use of the fuel. What an incisive idea ? Why not, cut the production of 2 and 4 wheelers by 15% / one more holiday per week for all auto companies ?
9 other relevant reasons for the blast
The Natural wealth of the Country, which includes Oil, belongs to the people.
Why should they pay more, for the reckless, wayward, excess greed of the Government, when the intended price rise is not reasonable and counter productive ?
Government is attempting to fool the Public and the Media, with meaningless reports and partial facts. It is preparing to shift the blame to others> Yet, earn more in a blatant, monopolistic manner with convoluted reasoning. It is a shameless, disgusting intended act
I am writing this page on the basis of the recent news reports of February, 2010. You have my permission to circulate this note to others
7th June 2010: Mr. Kirit Parikh, Chaturvedi and such other experts blabber their views on TV. CNBC TV 18 is the self Certified No 1 Business Channel. And I read Times of India, the No 1 English Daily in India. And then, there is Business Standard.
Why the hell fuel price should be raised is the question that the Media should ask first ?
Unlike Swarajya, Thuglak or Himmat, they lack gut and thoughts and act like dumb cassettes
Under Recovery by Oil Marketing Companies is a convenient but never explained phrase that all of them use ad nauseum. The Overheads have not been allocated properly is my opinion. If not, as in one Natwar Singh's joke, perhaps 50% of employee work in these companies
1. Misuse of Term: Subsidy
Subsidy means normally, assistance, aid in money. [ chamber's Dictionary]. I do get irritated and annoyed when subsidy term is used to denote the price at which, LPG gas is supplied to the public.
Question of giving subsidy to the Public / real owners of the Oil is an absurd notion / misuse of words. How can an owner get subsidy ?
If the Government sells a part / say 20% of production of the oil products, it is Subsidy to Public ! [ kerosene and LPG does not account for more - recollection of a recent news but not bothering to ferret out the exact percentage ]
Dubious Distortion:
The Government mandates Sugar Companies to sell 20% of their production to Government / Public Distribution System as Levy Sugar. Government's declared Fair Remunerative Price for Sugarcane is 140 per Quintal. That is, given 10% recovery, the Raw Material Cost is 14 per kg.
Government uses strong arm tactics to silence them. All Sugar Companies are incurring loss as of May 2010. The same Government, permits Reliance to price Gas at Dollars 4.2 per mbtu and the cost of Extraction is only Dollars 1.4 per mbtu !
Read below to know how much government also earns on Oil and yet cries about subsidy !
2. Government makes lot of Money on Mineral Oil / Crude / Petrol
ONGC, is a Government of India / Public Sector Undertaking - Public are the real, ultimate owners
In 2008-09, as per ONGC's Annual Report, the Profit before tax is 239807 Million Rupees on total income of 650494 Millions. That is, Profit before tax is 36.86%. On an investment of 50903 Millions [ page 22 of annual report ], it makes a profit of 239807 Millions. [ More than 4 times profit on investment !
So, any person saying that Government is making a loss on Petrol or anything, is a cheap liar / talking without reference to complete facts
3. Government presents convenient facts to mislead the Public, if no one asks
How much money they make from Minerals ?
Perhaps The Media and the Parliament doze / get entangled in the mountain of trash presented
Government made a lot of money with NMDC / National Mineral Development Corporation of India, with its export of Iron Ore. Iron Ore Mines are leased out to Private Companies as well at ridiculous, low rates - refer 'gift iron ore' page from sitemap 3
Be it Mineral / ore or Mineral Oil / Crude, Government is making Money. It gives iron ore, lime stone quarries and such other natural resources at ridiculous low prices - few only profit, not the Nation
The real owners, the public, can continue to cry for Kerosene or Coal. China buys Ore from India too and their steel prices are 15% cheaper than Indian Prices !
4 The Deliberately screened Monumental Disturbing Facts
[ On second thoughts, I am putting this point ahead of the next, so that you have the right background to understand the dubious game that the Government is playing - Why no one noted them is a wonder to me ! ]
a] From Crude, the output of Petrol can vary from 35 to 45 %. Nothing more
Boiling point of Petrol is I think, 78* Centigrade. As this would distill / come out first, the other higher boiling materials like light distillate / kerosene, heavy boiling oil / motor engine oil, the wax and the waste, Tar / Dambar should account for the remaining portion
Are all the other distillates priced properly ?
b] High Tax even after original objective met ?
It was under section 68 - NES / Not elsewhere specified. In the name of Bangla Desh war expenses, section 68 products came under 1% excise, then 2 %, under Janata rule 5%. Bangla Desh War expenses have been met which was the stated cause for Excise.
[ I have bought Petrol at Rs 1.37 paise and thereafter at Rs 1.75 / litre in 1974 and 1975. No excise duty then or to this extent ]
As the basic reason is irrelevant now, Excise should be abolished on Petrol.
The total Excise and Sales Tax paid by ONGC is 85443 on the above reported total income.
The Tax accounts for 13.13%
Can the Government reduce Tax ? Yes, if Public Protests shakes their chairs
Last time when the Government increased the price of LPG Gas Cylinder, Ms Shiela Dixit reduced the tax. The new price was lower than the old price. The whole exercise was a hoax.
When the Government increased the price of petrol 4-5 years back, Ms Brinda Karat pointed out in the Parliament that the Government collected over 5000 Crores in excess - Any one got refund ?
5. Aligning with International Crude Prices
This is the high sounding shallow exercise. Government wants to sanctify it with Mr. Kirit Parekh's report and such others in its shelves. It just does not make sense.
Crucify the Government and the lame duck supporters
Review the points below and judge for yourself
i] Pricing: Pricing a product should account / take into consideration the Raw Material Cost, Manufacturing / Production cost, Administrative cost, Selling and Distribution cost, Return on Investment and the perpetual, ever expanding, whimsical and arbitrary government levies.
Like an Opportunistic / mercenary / Monopolistic Seller, the proposed Fuel price hike seems based on 'what the market will bear approach'. There is no semblance / due weightage for any one of the above factors. I suspect that Reliance Industries is the unofficial, unsaid, Management Consultant to the 'Pricing Exercise'. They go unashamed with backtracking their 'tendered offer price of gas to NTPC'. That is Corporate Ethics for you. Is the Government acting any better ?
ii] International Linkage - only the Convenient excuse, but not all the Relevant Factors !
As of February 21, 2010, the Price of Petrol in America is cheaper than India - one of the richest country in the World. India is a country with over 30% below the Poverty Line. Did anyone check the reason for the lower petrol price in America ?
US petrol Price is below 3 Dollars per gallon. One US Gallon is 3.78 litres. Even assuming exchange rate of Rs 48 per Dollar, the price of Petrol in US is only
Rs 40 per litre at the maximum exchange rate and is about Rs 38, if the present exchange rate of Rs 46 is assumed valid for 6 months.
The figures above indicate the 'anomoly' and that is deliberately, side tracked
iii] Social Objective - dereliction of Duty !
Government should take into account the 'social objective / welfare of the Public' - that is its basic duty and is elected to office for that. If it fails, it looses the moral right, if any. But then, all governments are ultimately run by Politicians and 'moral' is a redundant, contradictory, word
6: Is the Government indulging in deliberate bluffing ?
I have my doubts.
Aviation Fuel: Aviation fuel is a special type of Kerosene. Government sells it at about Rs 27 per litre. Jet and Kingfisher complained in the past that Indian Prices are far higher than International Prices.
Government, reduces the price of Aviation fuel, promptly. And Kerosene is kept in short supply. The road side tea stall vendors pay Rs 40 / litre now. Policemen will come for sudden inspection and treat you worse than Dawood Ibrahim and ask for a bribe of 10000 or more for keeping kerosene [ In November, one person was asked a bribe of Rs 30000/- for keeping about 30 litres Kerosene ]
Why Not improve the Supply ? The Government, only prior to the election, remembers that 60& of Indian Public, earn less than Rs 5000/ per month
7. My suspicion
The Government / has not properly allocated the relevant cost to other products like Tar, Motor Oil and other items.
They harp on Petrol, LPG and Kerosene. ONGC was flaring / burning the Gas from Bombay High. Now they are getting some money. So, wherefrom, did the 'under recovery' and such other lies, germinate ?
The present Government is run by Indira Gandhi Congress !
Did she not cry about the Onion Price rising to 50 paise per kg and won an election !
8 Inflation - the Cascading effect
Goods have to be Transported from one place to another.
Maruti does not sell all its cars at Guragaon. Transportation cost go up when Petrol / Diesel prices are raised. Inflation is already ahead of expectations.
And at this juncture, Government raises the bogey of Petrol price hike ? It does not make sense. The most shoed minister, Chidambaram, is a self blown, all knowing expert. He found a link between Cement price and Inflation in 2007. As he is silent now, Transport cost will not lead to inflation !
9 Does ONGC pay proper commission to the selling Agents ?
Esso and Burmah Shell were not crying about low margins. They were selling Kerosene at 20 paise per litre. They became HPCL and BPCL, after they got thrown out of India by K.D. Malaviya
What is the International margin for selling agents ? How can there be under recovery by HPCL and BPCL, unless they have been grossly inefficient
Or, they got used to cost plus plus operation style, as a Government unit. Do we have to pay more for the inefficiency and corruption though they cannot be admitted or said ?
R.Ranganathan
The page may have to edited or contents added, depending upon feedback. This is the first shot.
| For hairloss control, Dandruff Remedy and hair gain: Site map 1 Hair Consultation Supply Contact |
| Haircare: Tips for the Top...RUfooled...Social Subjects...spicy shots Others: Major links are at the top of each page . |
| Errors and Omissions exempted. If there be any unwanted oversights, mistake in content or suggestions for improvements, please e mail us |
| Main / original content: 2001: Last minor modifications: June 12, 2010: Personal website of R. Ranganathan M.Sc., [ MBA - IIMA] |